The Earth Shift

Q: Esteemed HS, you know how much human beings love to know what will happen. Just think of gambling…..so, why?

HS: Certainty. Attraction to the good and avoidance of the bad. Humans understand instinctively, by human training, that bad things will happen. This creates the desire to avoid, by knowing.

Q: Wait a minute….if humans understand instinctively, then that's NOT training. Isn't instinct automatic and natural?

HS: No. Many things seem instinctive because such traits, qualities and behaviors are either specifically chosen or accepted as a seemingly natural part of human behavior.

Remember humans were created, not evolved. This means the behaviors are the result of a chosen, not a developed, trend.

Q: Does this apply to animals?

HS: Yes, many species' specific traits are chosen for the species as it is introduced, or develop from circumstances and are accepted as a soul chooses to incarnate as such animal. Human study of anthropology has identified this trend well.

Q: These developed instinctive behaviors do not apply to humans?

HS: Not the same way as with animals; many reactions humans display as instinct are not. They are specifically chosen.

Q: What about survival, such as a newborn baby's automatic ability to locate a nipple on a mother's breast, or a crawling baby's natural depth perception?

HS: These are implanted instincts, not developed through evolution.

Q: OK, so back to the subject, predictions of good and bad.

HS: Humans choose what is good and bad, the vast majority of human behavior. Very little is instinct, very little beyond the behaviors designed for that.

Q: What is the basis for and fascination with predicting future events?

HS: Security, understood in many ways.

Q: Why aren't young children fascinated with the idea?

HS:     They have not yet been indoctrinated in the linear time illusion of human existence. Adults will say, the children do not understand. We say, the adults are the ones who have trained the understanding out of themselves.  

Q: I suspect a good deal of predictability revolves around responsibility. We like certainty, in order to avoid criticism or negative consequences.

HS: This concept overlaps control, a response to need for security, for survival. Attempting to exercise control supplies an illusion of safety, where this illusion serves a need in a specific human.

Q: This all sounds like known human behavioral study, so why the fascination with predicting the future?

HS: You assume there is one, because you extrapolate the past. It is easy to look at events through memories and see them scheduled along a numbered line. Because the line leads to where you find yourself now, it is natural to expect there is another unknown line leading forward.

You drive down a road you know well, but this time in a thick fog. You cannot see the road but your memory of it provides confidence it is there and will be the same as it has been the many times you have seen it.

Another person unfamiliar will not drive this road in the same manner or speed as you. Both experienced driver and the first time motorist on this road share the knowledge, the belief, that the fog will lift at some point. Your knowledge of the road gives you the confidence to travel, and you understand, through your Earth timeline illusion experiences, that you will also be the unfamiliar motorist along a roadway you have never seen.   

It is natural to seek this confidence, and the predictability of a future supplies it.

Q: So, the desire to see a future predicted is the product of learned expectations?

HS: Entirely. Conditioned expectations.

Q: What about for alien extraterrestrials? Does the same perspective apply?

HS: Yes, although for different hopes and preferences and with less expectations compared to humans. We speak of the advanced extraterrestrials compared to current human scientific development.

Q: How does this apply, this desire for knowledge of outcomes of upcoming events, to things like a political election, such as Brexit or a US presidential election?

HS: Decisions and reactions are what create reality, within the reality humans create for themselves collectively and individually. The Brexit vote created the ability to make future decisions, within the scheme already devised. All are a creation of human perspective. Likewise, the selection of a leader has meaning only by the attitudes the majority are willing to adopt or continue, regarding a leader. It is easier to deposit responsibility than to assume it. There is nothing amiss with doing so, but for the desire to not recognize this aspect. If you are a citizen of the nation choosing a leader, rarely will that person control your life to any extent. The illusion such leader can in fact and deed control you, alters behavior.

It is always interesting to see the events approach that you believe will affect you. It allows you choice of agreement or opposition, and through choice comes learning and understanding.

Q: What about souls, with no physical body and no time?

HS: There are no predictions as humans understand. There are simply choices; we suggest you view these as items purchased. You may buy one item, several or none. Each is available, and can be discarded as you prefer. Once gone, the item is not relevant unless you choose such point-of-view. You may discard the alternative if you choose no attachment to the memory of it. The things, the people, places, events, animals and occurrences you choose to be relevant are always a choice, never a fixed thing.

What is meant by the simultaneousness of all possibilities, is this.

Q: This idea would never be popular on Earth.

HS: Until the sun stopped rising or moving across the sky, an event never to come to you during this lifetime.

Q: How are you able to predict the winner of an election, be it a collective decision or a candidate?

HS: Probabilities against alternatives. The decision pattern of humans solidifies as the choice's moment approaches. Bear in mind your human words of moment and momentum. The latter means movement, the former represents the absence of movement. If the words are so similar, and in many languages are the precise same word, why then are they seen as different things? We say, they are not, they only seem that way.

Q: How then is the gaining of momentum the same as a single stationary moment in time?

HS: Movement towards the absence of it. We shall explain: all alternatives are available and equivalent, as they can be joined together as you prefer. Gaining momentum means several are arranged, by choice of perspective, to converge. As they do, they represent a single point. A single moment.

Q: No human sees this.

HS: Not automatically, no. This is the effect of being human, a distortion you choose to experience. It is always a choice.

Q: Why can't predicted events be given a date or time when they will occur?

HS: Because this is not relevant. Just as it is not relevant to know the precise spot upon either cricket or baseball, where impact with the bat will occur. What matter are velocity and angle. Earth time is the product of the globe's rotation, no different than a ball thrown to be struck. When a prediction is desired, such forecast requires the counting of Earth's rotations and also the location of the Earth. Neither of these are relevant.

We refer to Earth's calendar…it is always a different date, somewhere else on the surface. If we say the 13th for an Australian, it can be the 12th for a Canadian. The event can occur on two dates, but it is only one event. The difference is simply perspective.

Q: Some predictions of future events are very accurate nevertheless. Why?

HS: Proximity. It is easier to see thus count rotations.

Q: How can you know the outcome of the US presidential election, given the many, many variables and more importantly, why do you predict it? What purpose is served?

HS: We know the outcome because of prior choice. The prevailing candidate has selected this event as a life marker. Often even a name applies, the meaning of trump explains. This candidates' life history involves doing this regularly, to this end. So that is the one half of the equation. The other and larger half involves each voter who will cast a ballot. Many agree as part of their life plan, to vote for the outcome, by prior agreement.  

Q: What gain can be derived and is this why such candidate selection occurs?

HS: Yes, this is why it takes place and the gain is opportunity for experience. Supporters examine events and outcomes leading to the point of selection, and gain understanding and perspective. The choice of a candidate, either winner or loser, provides the voter a good opportunity to examine reasons, motives and desires for the outcome. If the winner is disliked, this reaction supplies the voter an opportunity to look into preferences of others different from one's own. The shoe is on the other foot, as humans like to say, and this changes the walk.

Q: We often get no prediction from you; in fact, I get silence. Why?

HS: Control. You must sense you have it. You always do, all of you, but you must sense that you indeed have it. A beautiful sunset means something different, or nothing at all, to a blind person. You would quickly lose a sense of control if predictions were regularly issued, and participation in events would wane. Disinterest would rise and this would undermine the purpose of your life.

Just as knowing good and bad, as you consider anything to be either, would quickly remove contrast and difference, and then what meaning would good hold, if there were no bad

Note: How to Channel

GAGs have a support supervisory role.All of us get this from at least one and often several, depending on the moment. They supply information.

A channel as conduit, converted from noun to verb, has come to mean an action humans initiate. That might be the case for some people, however generally it's a willingness to offer back, the flow not initiated or controlled the way humans usually understand that. (For example, placing a telephone call, writing a letter, sending an e-mail or text message, etc.) It can seem easy enough when it happens but sometimes we don't get information. The "celebrity" interviews of well known people, appear here only as a connection has been given. Sometimes, nobody answers the knock at the door.

EVERYONE can "channel" without training in hydrodynamics or construction and no water is necessary. S/he who speaks can learn to speak another language.A bike rider can ride it where somebody else took a cool, unusual and fantastic bike trip.

Step 1: Acknowledge your GuardianAngel(s) - they are not humans and might never have incarnated. They know you as your true self and understand your place on Earth, your circumstances and the challenges YOU planned. You asked them to assist you, a GREAT honor. It is a compliment of the HIGHEST order to be asked to serve this role. There is NO burden involved; you have given a gift of value un-measurable in objective, impartial terms.

Step 2: Recognize their communication with you. How? Step 1 goes 90-95% of the way. The remaining 5-10% simply require patient listening, a good Q&A session done regularly. Don't expect quick results but don't be surprised either, if that happens. Just like antibiotics or exercise, it's a steady, even approach that works.

Step 3: As you ask and listen, write down what you think is communication "from beyond" separate and distinct from your thoughts. Don't be concerned with accuracy; just write down what you believe are communications, on a hunch, as it seems that way. Set aside your notes for an hour or even overnight. When you look them over, you will feel what is communication from Angels and what isn't.